Author: Deano

The main thing to remember is this:

It's not so much about the number of fish in the sea, as enjoying the fishing trip.

You can choose have fun on your little outboard skiff with nothing more than a sun-ripened bologna and mayo sandwich and a few cans of 'store brand' grape soda cooling in the water – still slotted in their plastic six-pack rings, and moored to the boat with a length of polyester marine rope… Even if you never catch anything, there's so much to enjoy: the silence of the early morning run before the other fisherpeople wake up, the sun beating down overhead at noontime, the call of the distant loon advocating "hooks up, head home". It can be exciting, and meditative. It can make you feel more human, and more connected to the natural world.

There are a lot of variations, of course, including –

• The Reluctant Reel, who throws back everything that makes it in the boat then immediately casts again (sometimes with the same worm)…
• The Gadget Freak, who spends time and effort tracking down the best spot on the lake, sure to have the best, most beautiful, and biggest fish…
• The Goal Catcher, who lands their fair share, but refuses to keep anything that isn't on their particular list of acceptable species, no matter if that means going home with an empty belly a lot of the time.

Then there's the rest of you, who just bring a spork and a salt packet with you wherever you go, in the hopes someone will just magically leave a plate of Lobster Thermidor out on the sidewalk. Believe me, that's a meal you probably won't be as happy about the next day.

You can worry endlessly about how many fish are out there, if you'll get the right one, or even wind up with one at all… But all that obsessing really does is keep you from noticing your own smiling reflection on the shimmering water, the cool breeze running through your hair… And, in a few cases, even the person sitting across the boat from you, rod in hand, wondering when you'll remember that they're there…

Are there plenty of fish in the sea?

The simple answer is that it's a jurisdictional issue. Where you reside in marriage will determine the "ground rules" for any divorce proceeding. It's likely that any prenup such as you describe would be fairly easy to invalidate in California, for example.

It may also be that the place in which you are married may influence the outcome – this is much rarer, but especially for marriages that take place internationally, the validity of the marriage itself may be called into question, which could then affect the validity of the prenuptial agreement (if the nuptials are not recognized, the contract may be invalid, and common law could then be applied).

For what it's worth, I think you may benefit more from using a "Relationship LLC" model[*] for your 'marriage'. This would mean, effectively, that you would be "business partners" in your relationship, and subject to customized agreements that are made between the partners – rather than being subject to all the various aspects of existing marriage laws (which again, vary significantly based on where you live).

As an example, you could draw up an agreement that provided "shares" to each participant, that vested over time – if your fiancée wants half your assets, she would have to stick with the relationship for a specified period. This would also enable you to have a "buy out" clause – you could simply pay for her vested shares based on the length of the relationship and current value of mutual holdings. Alternately, you could even keep all your "incoming assets" separate, and only share those things that are truly shared – things like cars, houses, investments, etc that happen during or as a key component to the relationship. That way, even if you do a 50/50 split, it's only splitting those things that were actually shared between you, and not all prior and ongoing income/assets/etc.

It's not really simple (neither is regular marriage law), but it seems almost ideal for a situation in which you are pre-planning your divorce before being married.

And while I won't pass judgment, I will definitely advise extreme caution in proceeding either way. Even really "ironclad" contracts are dependent on the good faith of all involved parties to some degree… If you cannot trust your fiancée, then it may be that you will eventually lose everything, regardless of how much pre-planning you do.

Good luck!

[try here for a more detailed overview: relationshipllc.com]

Is a prenuptial agreement possible for anyone?

Emotions are meant to be felt, not controlled or suppressed. Actions, on the other hand, are entirely up to you.

As far as the ethical actions based on singular or shared romantic interest are concerned: generally speaking, what feels wrong to anyone involved, should be addressed by everyone involved, or presumed to be "morally wrong" if such a discussion/intervention isn't possible.

Thus, if you were to move forward without the knowledge of the "Other Significant Other", then it's fair to say that conduct is most likely unethical – and even in the few edge cases where the ethics are sound, or in flux, it's definitely bound for more headaches and frustrations than any heartfelt romance should ever need to be.

How ethical is it to be close friends with a taken person, which then turns into a romantic interest?

It's guaranteed to be irrelevant if he's not breaching stalking or harassment laws.

As much as you think he needs to get over you, you need to get over the need to have some control over him now that you're apart. You cannot be sure of what he will do, but you can spend an awful lot of time worrying about it, instead of moving on. Don't do that.

Instead, look inside, really ask yourself why you can't let go of thinking about him, and just work on whatever's keeping you from moving forward. Perhaps, someday, you'll even fire up google, and see where he's at yourself.

If my ex is not over me, then is it almost guaranteed that he will consistently Google my name and look at my Facebook?

I'd guess that the computational intensity of maintaining non-block "affinity blacklists" for each user doesn't have a corresponding payoff to make it worth doing. Similarly, I'm not sure people would want to "list ex-relationships", even privately within the system… For one thing, it would be a personal reminder… But sooner or later, the Zuckatroids would start using it to send you ads that would somehow relate back to that ex, and that would just be all bad.

Consider the occasional surfacing a "lesser of evils" – especially if you aren't willing to outright block her… Though, you may want to give that option, and why you're hesitant about it, some further thought.

Will Facebook ever be smart enough to not display ex's on the "People You Might Know" section?