Deano’s answer to: “What is it like to have a savannah (cat) as a pet?”

With such a comparatively young and genetically fluid breed, there's a lot of variance in appearance, degree of expression of breed-standard behavior, and even personality that makes this question somewhat difficult to answer.

Then again, change the wording of the question to "What is it like to have a cat as a pet", and the same would largely be true. Cats, dogs, parrots – each pet is an individual, and the best a breed specification can give you is a "ballpark of possibility", rather than a "spreadsheet of expectation".

Specifically, though, Savannah cats tend to behave like a "tomboy cat that grew up in a house of, say, Great Danes"… They're tough, they play and greet much rougher than most cat breeds, and most of them really do behave a bit like they have some dog in them somewhere – attaching to one or more specific family members, and following them/curling up with them everywhere. Even the Savannahs that aren't very "dog-like" are much more social, and less desirous of "alone time" compared to the average house cat. Like most dogs, they like to be at the party, rather than just observing it from a safe distance.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B…

Also, they leap. Not jump, leap. It's really a sight to see… Basically, give up on hiding/securing anything "out of reach" of a Savannah, because there is no such thing. This is also an issue outdoors – in many counties of California, for example, the maximum allowed fence height (without additional permits/permission from neighbors) is 6 feet – which admittedly won't stop most cats, but won't even slow down a Savannah.

Speaking of laws… As a hybrid breed, Savannahs are often a little trickier or more of a hassle to house in certain cities, counties, and states. For a basic 'feel' for how animal control will feel should they ever pick up your crafty escape artist, check out http://www.hybridlaw.com/, but also be sure to double-check with the local authorities and/or vets – sometimes the law and practical understanding/execution of the law can get slightly out of whack, and while you can be totally in line with the rules – it's really hard to resurrect a cat that's already been mistakenly euthanized, or to successfully sue those responsible.

I've also never seen or heard of a Savannah that hated water to the extent most cats do, and I've seen firsthand one who would intentionally hurtle itself into a full bathtub, cannonball-style (cat-onball?).

Beyond that, from the Savannahs I've met, and what I've read online about the breed, there really isn't a lot of common ground that isn't common to all other cats. The main thing is, whichever idiosyncrasies your individual Savannah expresses, it will express them to the Nth degree, including less desirable things like aggression/hostility (very rare from what I've seen/heard[†]), marking/scratching/eating your stuff (somewhat, er, less rare, shall we say).

If you're a dog person who married a cat person, the Savannah might be the perfect compromise… And if you're a cat person, there's really nothing to hold you back (unless you're also a bird person). Oh, right, except, you know, cost[*].

[* Unfortunately, last I checked, Savannahs of verifiable breeding still run from $1000 for a 6th+ generation "SBT" cat, right on up to $20K and beyond for "F1" generation cats with 50+% Serval in them. Think about that a bit the next time you're scoffing at that otherwise-cute tabby at the local shelter.]

[† Combine the social factor with the leaping and "roughness", and then just try to leave that cat alone in an apartment all day – imagine a cat that is much more prone to abandonment issues, who needs a "strong leader" to stay in line… In terms of the worst case scenario, they can be like the cat version of a pit bull, just at a much much higher price tag. There are more and less naturally aggressive or needy Savannahs, but in any case let's just say it's probably not a great "first pet" for someone who isn't able to give it the attention and direction that it deserves. ]

What is it like to have a savannah (cat) as a pet?

Deano’s answer to: “What is the difference between a match and friend score on OKCupid?”

The ascribed difference is pretty straightforward:

  • Match percentage indicates a statistical likelihood of reciprocal romantic interest between a given pair of users
  • Friend percentage indicates a statistical likelihood of reciprocal friendship compatibility between a given pair of users

While it can be somewhat confusing to see both numbers when one is using OKC exclusively for dating purposes, some users indicate an affinity for the friendship number as a "counterbalance" to the flames of mutual lust that may arise… That is, a high Match percentage could indicate a strong romantic/initial interest, whereas the Friend percentage shows potential for a longer term,less sexually-focused relationship.

As Di Huang says, however, the validity of either percentage "on the ground" in real world settings is questionable, and until OKCupid/IAC release hard data on date outcomes/feedback/success rates tied back to these match percentages, it will be impossible to validate how accurate the underlying algorithms are.

What is the difference between a match and friend score on OKCupid?

Deano’s answer to: “Would a dating site that used 23andMe data be considered Eugenics?”

No.

If that were the case, one could also make the argument that any of the physical statistical profile fields were also a form of Eugenics – specifically, things like body type, race, height, eye color, etc.

Unless you have access to an amazing new site (tell me, I'll sign up!), there are no dating sites currently which use their matching algorithms to force a mating that produces offspring. This would seem to be a pragmatic requirement of any successful Eugenics program.

It is possible that, if enough credence were given to a given dating site's algorithm as being actually effective in producing accurate and successful longterm matches that would lead to offspring, and enough people worldwide joined as a result (numbering in the billions), that this would create a "defacto" Eugenics application – assuming that the site used at least some genetically-influenced characteristics for its matching, and further favored certain types of matches across races/cultures/etc worldwide. Data from 23andMe could then also be used to accelerate the speed of eugenic effects after the first few generations of offspring.

As someone working on an online dating site, I find the prospect to be a highly unlikely outcome within our lifetimes, either intentionally or accidentally.

Would a dating site that used 23andMe data be considered Eugenics?

Deano’s answer to: “If you know that someone has visited your dating profile and not sent you a message, is it better to contact them or to explore other matches?”

Let's step back from the details of the question for a sec…

What you can learn from someone checking out your profile is simply that their account is active, nothing more. If nothing else, this should say to you that they are worth writing to, if you are interested.

Don't overanalyze things. If you write and get no reply from someone who did check your profile, you have exactly the same amount of data about their interest level as someone who hasn't seen your profile and doesn't reply to your message.

Given all the other reasons they may not have messaged you (many sites only let paying members send messages, for example), it's in your best interest to pursue everyone you take a fancy to when you're searching online, so long as you take your time, and make a proper effort.

To be perfectly clear: I don't think that "who's viewed me" is a useless metric, but I think that it shouldn't carry much. I also don't think that "never viewed me" users are more likely to be interested.

In the end, I'm just concerned that the querent might spend so much time trying to find someone "likely to be interested", that they forget to BE INTERESTING, and to PURSUE PEOPLE THEY ARE INTERESTED IN. 🙂

If you know that someone has visited your dating profile and not sent you a message, is it better to contact them or to explore other matches?