Deano’s answer to: “During the battle on Hoth between the rebel forces (who are trying to protect their evacuation) and the imperial troops, why doesn’t Han help Luke and the others defend against the AT-AT Walkers?”

Great question!

There are several reasons for this:

  • Han Solo has a death mark – he is currently being pursued by Jabba the Hutt‘s bounty hunters – and through various interactions at the beginning of Empire, it’s clear he is a “reluctant rebel”, falling in with them mostly as the safest place to be for the moment, not his ideological/spiritual home.
  • Chewbacca is still (with the help of various rebel repair-droids) fixing the Millenium Falcon to ensure its effective escape.
  • Han Solo has (for mostly personal reasons) to ensure that Princess Leia (who is manning the command center to help direct the defense of the Hoth base) gets safely to the evacuation ship.

Breaking the fourth wall for a second, the Millenium Falcon is a plot device that must remain behind/in danger/off-screen until the last possible second to increase dramatic tension and excitement before flying to safety/saving the day:

  • In “A New Hope”, Han and Chewie fly back to knock Darth Vader off Luke Skywalker‘s tail so he can blow up Death Star Mk. I
  • Also in “The Empire Strikes Back”, the ship barely escapes between the closing teeth of the giant space worm
  • Also in “The Empire Strikes Back”, R2D2 repairs the hyperdrive mere seconds before the Falcon can be pulled in by a Star Destroyer tractor beam at the climatic end-of-movie escape sequence
  • In “Return of the Jedi”, Lando Calrissian and Nien Nunb barely pilot the Falcon free of the onrushing explosion of Death Star Mk. II at the end of that film

Ultimately, the in-plot reason can be boiled down to this: it isn’t until the third movie, “Return of the Jedi”, that Han Solo becomes a true hero of the Rebel Alliance. Throughout “The Empire Strikes Back”, or perhaps up until his first true love kiss with Princess Leia just before being frozen in Carbonite, Han Solo remains a self-reliant smuggler and rogue.

(For more details on the Millenium Falcon in particular, the Wookiepedia article is really quite interesting: http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/M… )

This answer originally appeared on Quora: During the battle on Hoth between the rebel forces (who are trying to protect their evacuation) and the imperial troops, why doesn’t Han help Luke and the others defend against the AT-AT Walkers?

Deano’s answer to: “What were the battle dynamics of the Imperial attack on Hoth?”

Question Details: I don’t understand why the attack failed, and why the rebels were able to escape. Part of this involves the mistake that the general made re: pulling out of hyperspace too early. I don’t understand that element, but I think there is more to understand re: what happened.

Let me start by correcting you a bit, with a scene from The Empire Strikes Back between General Veers and Darth Vader:

VEERS
My lord, the fleet has moved out
of light-speed. Com-Scan has
detected an energy field protecting
an area around the sixth planet of
the Hoth system. The field is
strong enough to deflect any
bombardment.

VADER
(angrily)
The Rebels are alerted to our
presence. Admiral Ozzel came out
of light-speed too close to the
system.

VEERS
He felt surprise was wiser…

VADER
He is as clumsy as he is stupid.
General, prepare your troops for a
surface attack.

VEERS
Yes, my lord.

It’s glossed over pretty quickly as you mentioned, but here’s a basic tactical summary, based on my personal experiences in Extraterrestrial Defense and FTL Navigation Principles:

Hyperspace travel consumes and radiates an enormous amount of energy for even a single ship – note the bright “flash” of light whenever a ship drops back to relativistic speeds in the movies. These energy bursts should thus be easy to detect, and probably form the basis of most tactical naval intelligence in the Star Wars universe.

It stands to reason, as well, that placement of the detection equipment could have an enormous effect on the total range of such sensors… And, since the Rebel Alliance is trying to hide their presence completely on Hoth, it also makes sense that they would not use any orbital, or even system-wide detection satellites for the job – since doing so would allow the Empire to surmise a hostile presence of some kind without needing to engage in costly and time-consuming searches by Probots.

So, we’re left with the following: planetary surface dishes/arrays which, like our own Earth-side radio and optical telescopes, have a much shorter effective range compared to space-based equivalents, and which have a much harder time picking smaller, subtler signals from the noise created by the atmosphere, solar radiation, etc.

With all of the above as background, I submit the following:

By exiting hyperspace too close to the planet/system, the Rebels on Hoth were able to detect the incoming fleet of Star Destroyers, giving them time to raise their energy shield, and force the Empire into a more costly ground engagement.

If Admiral Ozzel had, instead, opted to exit from hyperspace further out – say 5-10 AU, it’s likely that the hyperspace signatures of the fleet would’ve escaped detection, which in turn would’ve allowed them to approach slowly, and fire a large, concentrated, and continuous barrage of beam and impact weaponry – or perhaps even going the most sophisticated/stealthy route, and towing large rocks from the nearby asteroid belt, and hitting the rebel base with them(*).

As for the attack itself failing:

It again is a result of poor asphyxiated Ozzel’s gaffe – the Empire went from simply interdicting/capturing/destroying the Rebels at their whim, to needing to make a more obvious frontal assault on their shield generators.

This in turn allowed the Rebels to enact counter-strategies in advance based on the most likely scenario – AT-AT walkers supported by speeders and ground troops. This may also explain why the snowspeeders are all equipped with magnetic grapple guns – if you think about it for a moment, there doesn’t seem to be too many other potential military uses for such, and if it was a wholly-improvised solution imagined by Luke Skywalker, it is unlikely that the filament cabling would’ve been “randomly up to the task” of tripping up a blaster-proof metal beast with 30′ legs.

These delaying tactics, plus a concerted defense of the shield generators, would possibly allow for the comparatively calm/orderly retreat depicted in the movie.

(* Even a near-miss by a 1km-wide boulder travelling at, say, .0001c (or, as I call it, “mach 90“) at impact, would cause such apocalyptic damage that any survivors would likely expire within minutes if not hours – and the dust and ash thrown skyward would drastically hamper the operation of any air or spacecraft which subsequently attempted to leave the surface – think a couple thousand Eyjafjallajokull-level volcanic eruptions occurring simultaneously, and you get the idea.)

This answer originally appeared on Quora: What were the battle dynamics re: the Imperial attack on Hoth?

Deano’s answer to: “Who is the best companion to The Doctor? Why?”

Well let’s see… In reverse order, the top ten are empirically known to be:

  • #10 Adric – died, and stayed dead – definitely cool points for a time travel series. I think he also wins for whiniest by a large margin, as well…
  • #9 Jo Grant – stood toe to toe against the Master himself, and defeated his hypnosis technique with nursery rhymes. Bad. Ass.
  • #8 Tegan Jovanka – If Crocodile Dundee and David Bowie had a daughter*, it would be Tegan. Longest continuous series run, at 3 years 1 month. Also possibly the “longest running” companion in terms of chronological presence in the timeline (from the big bang to Earth’s 26th century). The only flight attendant ever to qualify for a spot in the TARDIS crew. Think about it. Also, the inspiration for the Mel Gibson film, Braveheart.
  • #7 Captain Jack Harkness – bringing back the Emo Trenchcoat to sexuality-questioning teen boys everywhere. Pure win! Also wins for largest hat size of any companion. Eventually.
  • #6 Leela – the noblest of savages, with enough bravado to go back into an about-to-explode lighthouse for her hunting knife. Killed the most people onscreen of any companion. Every Rose Has Its Janis Thorn…
  • #5 Romana II – onscreen and offscreen chemistry in action. Hubba-yow! Plus, extra points for anyone who gets to keep a K-9 at the end of their run. If you include the books and audio, she eventually becomes Lady President of Gallifrey!
  • #4 Jamie McCrimmon – You thought trenchcoats were sexy? Kilts are the real sexy. Most episodes for a single companion. Didn’t take no guff, nor any of that “color television” nonsense. A real man’s man.
  • #3 Amy Pond – why yes, I would like fries with that shake, Officer Pond. Purest form of “distilled sex per cubic centimeter” on the show, ever. Not that any of it is actually cubic…
  • #2 K-9 – Honest and loyal to a fault, armed to the teeth (or, er, nose, anyway), and unkillable – as evidenced by his own “4 regenerations” thus far. That’s more than KITT!
  • #1 Sarah Jane Smith – Rode with the best of the best. Another K-9 Award winner. Brought the Kastrian race back from extinction (briefly). Only companion (with K-9) to have her own ongoing series. What more could you ask for? We’ll miss you, Lis!

* I’ll pay $10,000 for filmed footage of any attempts, successful or otherwise.

This answer originally appeared on Quora: Who is the best companion to The Doctor? Why?

Deano’s answer to: “Is Doctor Who a children’s show?”

I’m watching Doctor Who with my 3 year-old daughter currently… We haven’t hit a single classic episode that has scared her yet, mostly she just pauses the video to ask questions about what Autotons are, why Cybermen are bad robots, or how the dinosaurs trying to eat the Doctor’s land rover are “pwobably gonna hurt dere teef”.

The new series, though, is not something she can sit through. She gets really really quiet, and I know that when I pause it to ask if it’s scary, she’ll nod and give me a big hug, before we agree to save that for when she’s “sebben”.

So, yeah, maybe I’m bringing her in a bit early… But the classic eps are all 22-24 minutes, which is a good length, and we get to talk about all kinds of science, espionage, language, culture, and architectural topics that don’t come up at the park or preschool. Still, even I notice a huge difference in the seriousness in the newer eps, even the first season – it’s very clear that people are gonna die, regularly, perhaps even horribly, and they’ll stay dead.

So in short:

  • Classic Doctor Who is aimed at children… I’d say everything up until the Colin Baker generation is completely safe[*], even for a 3 year old.


(Classic Who: Scary? Image courtesy of http://www.ovguide.com/tv_season…)

  • And as Danielle Maurer says, I think the New Doctor Who series should be called more of a “whole family”, or even “parental guidance” type show. It’s not adults-only, but your kids should be really firm on fantasy versus reality stuff before they watch it.


(New Who: SCARY!!! Image courtesy of http://clariethelioness.tumblr.c…)

As for so-far-unmentioned adult SciFi, I’d add Life on Mars, which was originally a BBC One production, and later remade (and only semi-destroyed) for American TV. It features a modern police detective who is knocked out and wakes up in the 60s – adjusting to the new time and culture, trying to figure out how he got there, using modern investigation techniques, and even trying to solve a “cold case” or two before they are actually ever cold. No spaceships or aliens, it always reminded me a bit more of The Prisoner.

[* Colin and Sylvester McCoy’s runs were… not creepy, more like pandering 80s network interfered-with craploads. This was at a time when the BBC heads were actively trying to cancel the show, so it’s perhaps natural to expect some more over the top “what’ve we got to lose, and it may get ratings” type attitudes. ]

This answer originally appeared on Quora: Is Doctor Who a children’s show?

Deano’s answer to: “Is using an ad blocker in your browser unethical?”

From an internet user’s POV:

There was a time several years ago that I religiously installed adblockers and flash blockers at every machine I used. Ads themselves had gotten way out of control, and were very annoying to deal with. So I killed them all.

Then, maybe the last 2-4 years, ads normalized a bit, and seemed to “get” that they were getting too crazy, and pulled way back. Fewer annoying popups/popovers/popunders by legit advertisers. Perhaps native browser support for blocking being more widespread led to a sort of truce between browsers and advertisers? I got lazy with blocking, and just let things lie. I even, now and then, found ads I actually clicked on, as targeting has improved.

Anyway, within the last two years, full page skippable ads, float-in and mouseover ads are getting a lot more common again. They’re more relevant, they don’t slow my machine down as much as before, but they’re still interfering with my experience of some of the major websites out there… As a result, I tend to visit those sites a bit less, to filter them via rss feeds, or even just rely on friends and followers to surface interesting content via FB/Twitter.

If things progress any further the way they’re going, I’ll be back to blocking ads. Certainly, I’d at least like more random ads – retargeting tends to show me the same 4-5 ads on a given site over and over again. I may not look like much of a quilted lingerie wearer, but maybe I need a gift for grandma? Anything but more survival knives and weight loss advice. Please.

As a sometimes-advertiser, I honestly don’t see anything unethical about adblocking – it’s just another consumer signal, that basically says “I hate your ad!” It makes me get more creative, both to enthrall those who don’t block ads, and to come up with alternate, less-spammy means to reach the adblocked parts of my target market. How I do that is a story for another day, but suffice to say that by and large people are willing to give you time and attention, even when you’re selling things on the Internet, so long as you respect that time given, and in general the intelligence of such consumers. Those who do neither, deserve to get every last one of their annoying flash monstrosities blocked.

This answer originally appeared on Quora: Is using an ad blocker in your browser unethical?