Category: Q & A

As a generalized idea, I'd say that the Q&A + voting + commentary format is a more natural user experience for the majority of corporate workers, when compared to the more general "wiki" experience.

That the latter has been successfully pitched/sold into companies (which often have difficulty making good longterm undirected use of same) is a very good sign that a "Quammer" or "Quorkia" type enterprise edition of Quora could do equally well, especially if combined with various types of dashboards/stats to help surface participants well-respected within their department/across the company (which is otherwise generally only possible anecdotally in most SMB-and-smaller level organizations.

Can Quora be customized for companies/organizations?

I think there are several backend ranking metrics for which thanks could be useful… Say as a ratio of "answers to thanks" to help identify reputation/non-spamminess in a given user's contributions on-site. Such a metric could help people skip over initial moderation queues or post per day limits faster, or affect the weighting of their own up/down votes somehow.

As a straight upvote, I'd agree with Vicky Stringer, what's the point? If you can do both separately, there's no need to combine them… And whether it is simply as a gesture, or as a subtle means to suss out high quality participants, Thanks has clear extant or potential use cases that obviate the need for its elimination.

Should ''Thanks'' count as an Upvote?

You catch on quick! As an alternative or perhaps even antidote to the "Question and Answer" sites throughout the internet, Quora was created in part to subvert the direct A-B relationship – to help diversify the groups of questioners and answerers, lower bars of entry or need for reciprocity, by creating a "Question or Answer community", or Quora for short(*).

Still, given the wording of your question, I'd have to say NO, but only because the message is meant to be more overt, less subliminal.

Additional references to the naming of Quora are found here:

• When picking a name for the product, was it a consideration that "Quora" is bookended by the letters "Q" and "A"?
• Quora: Why is Quora named Quora?
• What should Quora be called in the Rage Comic universe?

(* The only other answer that makes sense for the name comes from my wife, who is Japanese, and remains convinced that the name has something to do with Australian Tree Marsupials.)

Does the name Quora have the subliminal message: Q/A = Qu-or-A?

Downsides of following topics include:

• Questions might be "mislabeled" with topic tags, causing unwanted questions to land in the feed.
• The sheer potential number of questions that can fill up your feed within the busier topics.

Downsides of following questions include:

• You can more easily forget why you cared about a question than a topic over time, especially if the question "heats up" a few days after you added it.
• Often, many similar questions exist, which share a topic. Follow one question, and you can miss out on excellent answers in related or even near-duplicate questions.

Downsides of following people include:

• Lots of them write really great single answers, but become downright scary to observe over time (case in point: Dean Blackburn)
• There appears to be a cap on per-user contributions to your feed, so you can miss great answers/questions/posts by people who over-exert like Yishan Wong.

Overall, the biggest downsides to all of the above options can be boiled down to this: the more items that appear in your feed, the greater a potential time sink Quora can become for you.

So, the answer to your question is: it depends. (yay)

If you have a few well defined interests, following those topics will make you less likely to get annoyed when they clog your feed.

If you find a really great question that you want to know the answer to, following it directly can save you a lot of trouble over following the topic(s) the question falls under. This can be a real "space saver" for the feed, assuming you don't also follow many topics and people.

Certain users – like Marie Stein, Shannon Larson, Jonas M Luster or Mark Hughes to name a few – seem to leave a lot of really great answers, either within a specific set of topics, or like "human-encyclopedic shotguns", peppering their wisdom across the site. Following them specifically can save you a lot of time(*).

In summary, the best method to create a "followed content" feed on Quora varies depending on the user, their own interests and expertise, as well as how much time they want to spend on Quora.

(* As an added bonus, these "Children of the Quorn", as they are often referred to, are also great discovery tools for the rest of us – while we sleep contentedly in our beds, they are wide awake seemingly at all hours… Seeking out new queries, and boldly laying the knowledge on us as if they were on some kind of "five year mission to get as many Marc Bodnick upvotes as possible".)

Is following topics, questions and/or people on Quora the better strategy to get a more interesting feed?

When I started trying to bold, underline, and italicize my Facebook Comments.

What were the first things which caused addicted Quora users to realize they are addicted?